Lately I’ve been experimenting with different AI generators, and while some of the results are really impressive, there are always little flaws that stand out. Sometimes it’s hands looking strange, or faces that feel just slightly off. It makes me wonder: will AI ever reach the point where it can generate fully realistic humans without these mistakes, or will there always be limits? I’d love to hear what others think about where this is all heading.
top of page
bottom of page
Ever noticed how AI art can be so close, yet so far? Like, I generated a landscape the other day, stunning vista, but the trees looked like broccoli! Does anyone else get distracted by these minor imperfections? In my experience, it always breaks the illusion. Wonder what Pacman 30th Anniversary AI art would look like!
I’ve had the same thoughts. When I tested Undress AI, I noticed that it handled proportions and body shapes pretty well, but details like small facial features or complex hand poses still need a lot of work. For me, I see AI as a tool to spark creativity and speed up drafts, not a total replacement for human artists. The opportunity is huge, but I think its best use is in collaboration, not substitution.
What I find most fascinating is how fast the quality is improving. A year ago, most AI images looked like obvious fakes, but now it sometimes takes a second glance to notice the errors. That makes me think the real future isn’t about perfection, but about how people will blend AI results with traditional editing or art skills to push creative projects further than either could do alone.